Last updated:
- Most footwear delivery failures are not sudden. They are visible in the factory weeks before the buyer is told.
- The question that predicts supplier reliability best is not “what is your on-time delivery rate” — it is “can you tell me what stage my order is at right now?”
- A factory running on ERP can answer in minutes. A factory running on spreadsheets and WhatsApp answers after it has phoned the floor.
- Foot On Shoes runs production on ERPNext with real-time stage tracking, which is what makes an internally tracked 98% on-time delivery figure meaningful rather than aspirational.
Every manufacturer quotes an on-time delivery figure. Almost none of them can show you how it is calculated, and the definition does most of the work.
Ask three follow-up questions and the number usually dissolves:
Foot On Shoes tracks 98% on-time delivery internally, measured against the confirmed date, and we describe it that way deliberately — it is our own operational figure, not a third-party certification. What makes it credible is not the number. It is that the system producing it can be interrogated at any moment.
A supplier who can show you the current state of your order does not need you to trust their historic average.
“We use an ERP” is now a standard claim, and it covers a wide range of realities. What matters is whether the system is where work is recorded as it happens, or where someone types up what happened last week.
At FOS, production runs on ERPNext, and an order moves through defined stages that are updated at the point of work:
Material issue. Leather and components are allocated against the specific work order. If a material is short, it is visible as a shortage against your order, not as a general stores problem.
Cutting. Components cut and counted against the size curve. This is the earliest reliable read on whether the run is on schedule.
Closing. Uppers stitched. Closing is usually the longest stage and the one most likely to absorb a delay quietly.
Lasting and bottoming. Uppers lasted, soles attached. Adhesion testing happens here.
Finishing. Cleaning, dressing, quality sorting.
Packing. Cartons made up against the shipping marks.
Pre-shipment inspection. AQL 2.5 on the packed goods.
Because each transition is recorded when it occurs, the position of any order is known continuously rather than reconstructed on request. That is the whole difference. It is not a sophisticated capability — it is a discipline about when data is entered.
Slippage surfaces in days, not weeks. If cutting completes three days behind plan, that is visible immediately as a variance, not seven weeks later as a delivery failure.
Partial-shipment decisions become possible. If four of six colourways are packed and two are held on a material issue, you can decide whether to ship what is ready. You can only make that call if you know it.
Capacity questions get honest answers. Running at 1,800–2,000 pairs a day, we can see what is committed and what is free. When a buyer asks whether an additional 2,000-pair drop can be added in September, the answer comes from the production schedule rather than from optimism.
Quality data attaches to the order. With 400+ quality checkpoints recorded across a run, a rejection at pre-shipment can be traced to the stage where it originated. That is how the same fault stops happening on the next order, rather than being re-discovered.
When you are assessing a prospective OEM or ODM footwear manufacturer, ask this:
“Take an order you are running right now for another customer. Without calling anyone, tell me what stage it is at and whether it is on schedule.”
The answer is diagnostic, and it does not require the supplier to breach anyone’s confidence — no customer name, no product, just the stage and the variance.
Then ask the follow-up: “What will I see, and how often, once my order is in production?” Get the answer in writing in the purchase order. Reporting cadence is a specification like any other, and it costs nothing to agree up front.
A caveat worth stating plainly, because the technology argument gets overplayed.
Production tracking does not make shoes. A factory with a good ERP and poor lasting will produce well-documented rejects. Systems tell you where the order is; they do not tell you whether the people running the line know what they are doing.
Visibility matters because it is the multiplier on everything else. In-house production with no subcontracting means there is one place to look. 400+ quality checkpoints mean there is something meaningful to record. A 60–90 day production TAT from confirmed specification means there is a plan to measure against. The tracking system makes those facts checkable rather than claimed — which, for a sourcing director choosing between suppliers on the other side of the world, is most of what they were asking for.
Written by Sumit Joshan, Managing Director, Foot On Shoes. Foot On Shoes has manufactured women’s leather footwear in Agra, India since 1981, at a capacity of 1,800–2,000 pairs a day.
More on production process, capacity and lead times on our footwear manufacturing page. To discuss an order, contact solutions@fos.co.in or +91-9719-001-004.
Let’s discuss how Foot on Shoes can bring speed, and scale to your next collection.
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest collections and exclusive offers tailored for you.
By clicking Subscribe, you agree to our
Terms and Conditions.